Détails de la rétroaction

(2.5)
Communication
Créativité
Téflexion critique
Employabilité
Professionnalisme
Questions personnalisées
  • Q1 - Texte court
    What notable qualities or skills did the student demonstrate throughout the project?
    Aucune réponse n'a été donnée.
  • Q2 - Texte court
    How did the student engage with stakeholders during the project?
    Aucune réponse n'a été donnée.
  • Q3 - Texte court
    Did the student effectively manage their time and meet project deadlines? If so, how? If not, what areas could they improve in?
    Deadline was extended which was okay but the deliverables remained low quality and we cannot use it as our brand guide.
  • Rétroaction d'equipe

    Thank you for your effort on the deliverable. However, there are a few areas for improvement that we’d like to highlight to ensure stronger outcomes in the future. The overall effort appeared low, and the theme of the deliverable lacked consistency, which impacted its cohesion. Additionally, the work felt rushed, and despite our request for revisions to the graphs, they were not reworked as needed. We also noticed that best practices for using the brand kit were not followed, which is an important detail for maintaining professionalism and alignment. We hope these points will help guide future work, and we look forward to seeing even better results next time.
    Branding Brand identity Research Logo design
    Auteur
    Atika Juristia
    Elle / Elle
    Executive Director
    Expérience
    May 2024 - April 2025 USask Level UP
    Projet
    JHI Brand Identity and Graphic Design
    Branding Brand identity Research Logo design
    Créé
    décembre 4, 2024